Oferta Laboral en México: un enfoque de variables instrumentales

Cinthya Caamal Olvera

doi:10.29105/ensayos26.1-3

Autores/as

Cinthya Caamal Olvera

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/ensayos26.1-3

Resumen

The purpose of this paper is to estimate the labour supply in Mexico during the period 1988-2002, using micro information in a macro context. This objective will be pursued by analysing the factors relating to the decision of how many hours to work crosswise households, which is made by the head of household. This paper also examines whether or not macro factors, such as public spending on education made at the state level, might influence this decision across states. Firstly, the relevant demographic characteristics of heads of households, as well as assorted state decisions about education spending, are examined in order to estimate a labour supply and map the different responses from households across states.
It is useful to estimate the wage elasticity in order to account for the factors that make people work more hours and observe whether there is a preference for work or leisure and how spending on education, and the resulting wage effects, makes people modify their choices. There are several factors that influence the endogenous relationship between hours of work and wages; that is, the decision to work is affected by regional differences, limited number of vacancies across states, lack of unemployment benefits and reduced benefits received from government.
The Mexican case is interesting not only because of the differences in wage, education and development across states but also because of the tendency to work more hours per week than several developed countries on a regular annual base. For example, during the period of time considered and based only on working people aged 20-55 years old, one observes that men work on average 481 hours while women work about 38 hours per week. Alesina and Glaeser (2005) compare the hours worked by those employed and at working age in Europe and United States. They note that the US has the highest value for working hours, which is 392, while the lowest is Italy with

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Alesina, A., Glaesser, E. and Sacerdote, B. (2005), “Work and Leisure in the United States and Europe: Why So Different?”, Harvard Institute of Economic Research, Discussion paper 2068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w11278

Angrist, J.D, and Krueger, A.B. (1991), “Does compulsory School Attendance Affect Schooling and Earnings?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 106, pp. 979-1014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2937954

Artecona, R. and Cunningham, W. (2002), ““Effects of Trade Liberalization on the Gender Gap in Mexico.” Policy Research Report on Gender and Development, Working Paper 21. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Apps, P. and Rees, R. (2001), “Household Production, Full Consumption and the Costs of Children”, Labour Economics, 8, pp. 621-648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5371(01)00047-1

Barceinas, F. and Raymond, J. (2003), “¿Es rentable para el sector publico subsidiary la educacion en Mexico?, Investigacion Economica, UNAM, No. 244.

Becker, G. (1964), “Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education”, National Bureau of Economic Research, distributed by Columbia University Press.

Bound, J., Jaeger, D. and Baker, R. (1995),“Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation When the Correlation Between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable is Weak”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 90, No. 430, pp. 443-450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476536

Blanchard, O. (2004), "The Economic Future of Europe," Journal of Economic Perspectives”, Vol. 18, pp. 3-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330042632735

Blundell, R., Duncan, A. and Meghir, C. (1998),“Estimating Labor Supply Responses Using Tax Reforms”, Econometrica, Vol. 66, No.4, pp. 827-861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2999575

Oferta laboral en México: un enfoque de variables instrumentales 143 Blundell, R. and MaCurdy, T., (1999) “"Labor Supply: A Review of Alternative Approaches," Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume 3. North-Holland Publishing Co, Amsterdam.

Cahuc, P. and Zylberberg, A (2004), “Labor Economics”, the MIT Press. Consumer Price Index. Mexican Central Bank.

Cunningham, W. (2001), “Breadwinner or Caregiver? How Household Role Affects Labor Choices in Mexico”, World Bank Working Papers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2743

Gomez, A. and Madrigal, L. (2005) “The Evolution of Women’s Labor Force Participation in Mexico during the 20th Century: An Economic Perspective”, Documento de Trabajo CIDE, No. 334.

Gong, X. and van Soest, A. (2002),“Family Structure and Female Labor Supply in Mexico City”, The Journal of Human Resources, Vol 37, No.1, pp. 163-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3069607

Guichard, S. (2005), “The Education Challenge in Mexico: Delivering good quality Education to all”, Economics Department Working Papers, No. 447, OECD Publishing.

Hamermesh, D., and Slemrod, J. (2005) “The Economics of Workaholism: We Should Not Have Worked on This Paper”, NBER Working Paper No. 11566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w11566

Heckman, J. (1993), “What Has Been Learned About Labour Supply in the Past Twenty Years?, The American Economic Review, Vol. 83, No. 2, pp. 116-121.

Joumard, I. (2005), “Getting the Most Out of Public Sector Decentralisation in Mexico” OECD Economics Department, Working Paper No. 453.

Meléndez-Barrón, J. (1996), "Elasticidad de la oferta de trabajo en el Area Metropolitana de Monterrey: el tratamiento de los problemas de sesgo por ´seleccción´en la regla de participación laboral y por ´endogeneidad´ del salario", Ensayos. Vol. XV, Núm. 1, Mayo. pp. 1-32.

Mexican System of the National Accounts for state governments, National Institute for Statistics, Geography and Information, INEGI.

Murray, M. (2006), “Avoiding Invalid Instruments and Coping with Weak Instruments”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 20, Number 4, pp. 111-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20.4.111

National Agreement of the Basic Education Modernization (1992). Diario Oficial de la Federacion.

National Urban Employment Survey, 1988-2002, National Institute for Statistics, Geography and Information, INEGI.

Prescott, E.C. (2004), “Why Do Americans Work So Much More Than Europeans?”, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 2-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21034/qr.2811

Presidential Report (2005), Presidencia de la Republica Mexicana.

Psacharopoulos, G., and Woodhall, M. (1985), “Education for Development: An Analysis of Investment Choices”, Oxford University Press for the World Bank. Scott, J. (2001) “Who benefits from Social Spending in Mexico?”, Programa de Presupuesto y Gasto Publico, Centro de Investigacion y Docencia Economica, CIDE.

Staiger and Yogo (1997), “Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments”, Econometrica, Vol. 65, No. 3, 557-586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2171753

Stock, J. and Yogo, M.,(2002) “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression”, National Bureau Of Economic Research, NBER, Technical Working Paper 284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/t0284

Valero, J. and Tijerina, A. (2006), “Labor supply response to personal income taxation in Mexico”, Economic Analysis Working Papers, Vol.6, Issue 11.

Van Soest, A. (1995), “Structural Models of Family Labor Supply: A Discrete Choice Approach”, The Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 30, No.1, pp 63-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/146191

Wooldridge, J. (2001), “Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach”, South-Western College Pub, Second Edition.