Political institutions and tax rate initiatives

Autores/as

  • Raúl Alberto Ponce Rodríguez

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/ensayos28.2-3

Palabras clave:

Taxation, Tax Limitations, Redistributive Effects, Structure and Scope of Government

Resumen

In a model of a representative democracy, we incorporate into the analysis of tax design the constitutional provision that allows voters to propose tax initiatives. In this paper, we present a theory of tax substitution as the rationale for a tax rate limit (TRL) initiative. In our model the tax system at the status quo is determined by the electoral competition between parties. This political institution aggregates the voters’ preferences for tax policy according to the voters’ marginal proportion of the expected vote that different coalition of voters can deliver in the election. The approval of a TRL, however, depends on the majority rule, and it aggregates the preferences of the median voter of tax initiatives. Thus, a TRL is the result of two political institutions with different mechanisms to aggregate the preferences of voters. Moreover, our paper distinguishes the role of perfect and imperfect information on the distribution of voters´ preferences for tax systems in approving a tax initiative. In this paper we identify conditions on the distribution of preferences and income of the electorate and the median voter that guarantee the approval (rejection) of tax initiatives.

Clasificación JEL: H2; H23; H1


 

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Advisory Commission of Intergovernmental Relations U.S. (1995). “Tax and expenditure limitations on local governments”. Center for Urban Policy and the Environment. Indiana University.

Alesina, A.; and H. Rosenthal; Eds. (1995). “Partisan politics, divided government and the economy”. Cambridge. U.K., Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720512

Alm, J.; and M. Skidmore (1999). “Why do tax and expenditure limitations pass in state elections?”. Public Finance Review. Vol. 57, pp. 481-510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/109114219902700502

Atkinson, A. B.; and J. E. Stiglitz (1972). “The structure of indirect taxation and economic efficiency”. Journal of Public Economics. Vol.1, pp. 97-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90021-7

Auerbach, A. J.; and J. R. Hines Jr. (2002). “Taxation and Economic Efficiency”. In Auerbach A.J. and Feldstein M. (2002 eds.): Handbook of Public Economics. Vol. 3. North Holland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w8181

Attiyeh, R; and R. F. Engle (1979). “Testing some Prepositions about Proposition 13”. National Tax Journal. Supplement Vol. 32, pp 131-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41863165

Austen-Smith, D. (2000). “Redistributing income under proportional representation”. The Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 108, No. 6. pp. 1235-1269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/317680

________(1990). “Information transmission in debate”. American Journal of Political Science. Vol 24, No.1, pp. 124-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2111513

Banks, J. S.; and J. Sobel (1987). “Equilibrium selection in signaling games”. Econometrica. Vol 55. No. 3, pp. 647-661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913604

Baron, D. P.; and J. Ferejohn (1989). “Bargaining in legislatures”. The American Political Science Review. Vol. 83, No. 4, pp. 1181-2106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1961664

Black, D. (1948). "On the rationale of group decision-making". Journal of Political Economy. 56, pp. 23–34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/256633

Brennan, G.; and J. Buchanan (1978a). “Tax instruments as constraints on the disposition of public revenues”. Journal of Public Economics. pp.301-318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(78)90013-0

________(1978b). “The logic of tax limits: alternative constitutional constraints to the power to tax”. National Tax Journal. Supplement Vol. 32, pp.11-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41863151

________(1980). “The power to tax: analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Buchanan, J.; and G. Tullock (1962). “The calculus of consent”. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.

Citrin J. (1979). “Do people want something for nothing: public opinion on taxes and government spending”. National Tax Journal. Supplement Vol. 32, pp.113-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41863164

Courant, P. N.; E. M. Gramlich; and D. L. Rubinfeld (1980). “Why voters support tax limitation amendments: the Michigan case”. National Tax Journal. Vol 33, pp 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41862280

Courant, P. N.; and D. L. Rubinfeld (1981). “On the welfare effects of tax limitations”. Journal of Public Economics. Vol. 16, issue 3, pp 289-316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(81)90002-5

Coughlin, P. (1992). “Probabilistic voting theory”. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511895395

Denzau, A.; and R. Mackay (1980). “A model of benefit and tax share discrimination by monopoly bureaus”. Journal of Public Economics. 13 (3), pp. 341-368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(86)90010-1

Denzau, A.; R. Mackay; and C. Weaver (1979). “Spending limitations, agenda control and voters expectations”. National Tax Journal. Supplement Vol. 32, pp. 189-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41863170

Downs, A.; Ed. (1957). “An economic theory of democracy”. New York, Harper and Row.

Dye R. F.; and T. J. McGuire (1997). “The effect of property tax limitation measures on local government fiscal behavior”. Journal of Public Economics. 66, 469-487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00047-9

Fiorina, M. (1997). “Voting behavior”. In: Mueller D. (Eds.). Perspectives on public choice, a handbook. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664458.019

Fisher, R. C.; M. N. Gade (1991). “Local property tax and expenditure limits”. In: McGuire, T.J., Naimark, D.W. (Eds.). State and local finance for the 1990s: a case study of Arizona. Arizona State University”. Tempe, AZ, pp. 449–464.

Hettich, W; and S. L. Winer (1999). “Democratic choice and taxation”. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511572197

Husted, T. A.; and L. W. Kenny (2007). Explanations for states adopting limits on educational spending”. Public Finance Review. Vol. 35, pp. 586-605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142106295770

Joyce, P. G.; and D. R Mullins (1991). “The changing fiscal structure of the state and local public sector: the impact of tax and expenditure limitation”. Public Administration Review. 51, 240–253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/976948

Kahn, C. M.; and T. Tsolulouhas (1999). “Strategic transmission of information and short term commitment”. Economic Theory. Vol 14, pp. 131-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001990050285

Ladd, H.; and J. Wilson (1982). “Why voters support tax limitations: evidence from Massachusetts´ proposition 2 ½”. National Tax Journal. Vol 35 (2): pp.121-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41862431

Mueller, D. C. (2003). “Public Choice III”. Cambridge University Press. Persson, T.; and G. Tabellini (2005). “The economic effect of constitutions”. MIT press.

Persson, T., and G., Tabellini, (2005), The economic effect of constitutions, MIT press.

Ponce, R. A. (2006). “Essays on the political economy of taxation”. PhD Dissertation, Georgia State University, pp. 1-45.

________(2007). “Electoral equilibrium and tax rate limits, Working Paper”, Georgia State University and Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, pp. 1-45.

Preston, A. E.; and C. Ichniowski (1991). “ A national perspective on the nature and effects of the local property tax revolt, 1976-1986”. National Tax Journal. Vol. 44. 123–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41788887

Roemer, J. E. (2001). “Political competition theory and applications”. Harvard University Press. Cambridge Massachusets.

Romer, T.; and H. Rosenthal (1979). “Bureaucrats versus voters: on the political economy of resource allocation by direct democracy”. Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 93. No.4, pp. 563-587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1884470

Shadbegian R. J. (1999). “The effects of tax and expenditure limitations on the revenue structure of local government, 1962-1987”. National Tax Journal. Vol. 52, No.2, 221-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41789391

Shapiro, P.; D. Puryear; and J. Ross (1979). “Tax and expenditure limitations in retrospect and in prospect”. National Tax Journal. Supplement Vol. 32, pp 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41863150

Shapiro, P.; J. Sonstelie (1982). “Did proposition 13 slay Leviathan?”. The American Economic Review. Vol. 72, pp.184-190.

Sheshinski, E, (2007). “Optimum commodity taxation in a pooling equilibria”. Journal of Public Economics. Vol.91, pp. 1565-1573 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.03.008

Skidmore, M. (1999). “Tax and expenditure limitations and the fiscal relationships between state and local governments”. Public Choice 99. pp. 77-102.

Publicado

2009-11-01

Cómo citar

Ponce Rodríguez, R. A. (2009). Political institutions and tax rate initiatives. Ensayos Revista De Economía, 28(2), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.29105/ensayos28.2-3

Número

Sección

Artículos: Convocatoria Regular