Reviewer's Guidelines

We invite peers to participate as evaluators and kindly request confirmation of their collaboration within one week of receiving the invitation.

Evaluations are conducted online. A username and password will be provided along with the invitation.

Once peer reviewers accept the invitation, please complete the Review Format within six weeks of the acceptance.

Please also upload your comments for the authors as a letter in Word or PDF format.

If you are not an expert in the field of the article or do not feel qualified to perform the evaluation, we kindly ask you to decline the invitation. Please inform the editor of your reason for declining.

If possible, we greatly appreciate recommendations of other qualified peers who might perform the review for the journal.

Additionally, it is expected from peer reviewers to adhere to the COPE Code of Conduct. For more details, access the COPE guidelines here.

For further information, please refer to the guide and checklist for preparing a reviewer report by Berk et al. (2016A and 2016B).

 

Berk, Jonathan B., Harvey, Campbell R. and Hirshleifer, David A., Preparing a Referee Report: Guidelines and Perspectives (November 21, 2016 A). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2547191 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2547191

 

Berk, Jonathan B., Harvey, Campbell R. and Hirshleifer, David A., A Checklist for Reviewing a Paper (December 21, 2016 B). Duke I&E Research Paper No. 2017-03; Stanford University Graduate School of Business Research Paper No. 17-6. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2887708 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2887708